AUCO LONG-TERM ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH site

 

Research Highlights


Birds and Predators

Decline and recovery of the bird assemblage in Auco in response to an extended drought and subsequent ENSO
Numerical and functional responses of predators to a long-term decline in mammalian prey in Auco
Diet and prey selectivity by the Burrowing Owl Speotyto cunicularia in Auco
Long-term dynamics of guild structure among predatory vertebrates in Auco

On the decline and recovery of the bird assemblage in Auco in response to an extended drought and subsequent ENSO
Auco, and all of the semiarid region of Chile, is influenced by ENSO (El Niņo Southern Oscillation). Its absence causes droughts and its presence wet years, which in turn result in variations in resource levels for avian assemblages. We show that bird species richness and density follow some of these pulses closely. A total of 61 bird species, 32 of which were Passeriformes, was sighted during 1993-1997. Overall, 30 species (49%) were residents and 31 (51%) were migratory. The most speciose trophic groups were insectivores (34%), carnivores (28%), and granivores (25%). Bird species richness and density declined from 43 species and 45-50 individuals/ha in spring 1993 to 29 species and 15-20 individuals/ha in autumn 1996.

avian.gif (5848 bytes)

An increase was observed with the onset of El Niņo, reaching totals of 42 species (a 45% increase from 29) and densities of 55-60 birds/ha in summer 1997. Similar trends were observed in one of two major food resources measured: among small mammals but not among terrestrial arthropods. Positive correlations were found between raptor species richness and density and small mammal density, and not between insectivorous bird species richness or  density and terrestrial arthropod abundance. Because the climate was very dry during most of the time of our study, we may have witnessed the lowest boundary for species richness and bird density. Whether the 1997-98 El Niņo brought the maximum bird species richness and density for the site is yet to be seen.

birdspp.jpg

Back to Top

On the numerical and functional responses of predators to a long-term decline in mammalian prey in Auco
Occurrence and diet of ten carnivorous predators (four falconiforms, four owls, and two foxes), as well as population levels of their mammalian prey, were monitored over 1987-1990 in Auco. Early in this period, small mammals irrupted and then declined markedly to a density 7% of that at peak. All four falconiforms (Buteo polyosoma, Falco sparverius, Geranoaetus melanoleucus, Parabuteo unicinctus) and one owl (Tyto alba) responded numerically to the decline in mammalian prey by virtually abandoning the study site.

Numerical response of Small Mammals (4098 bytes)

The three other owls (Speotyto cunicularia, Bubo virginianus, Glaucidium nanum) and the two foxes (Pseudalopex culpaeus and P. griseus) remained. With few exceptions, throughout the study predators maintained species-specific preferences among small mammal species regardless of the absolute and proportional abundance of these prey. At no time did the two prey species most responsible for the irruption (the rodents Phyllotis darwini and Akodon olivaceus) occur in predators' diets out of proportion to their estimated relative abundance in the field. Predators were clearly unable to prevent the irruption from occurring. Given the absence of a clear functional response to the most irruptive species, predators seemed unlikely to have been responsible for the observed crash.They may, however, be prolonging the crash and delaying the return of small-mammal populations to typical densities.

Back to Top

On diet and prey selectivity by the Burrowing Owl Speotyto cunicularia in Auco

Speotyto cuniculariaOn a seasonal basis, we quantified the diet of Speotyto cunicularia throughout seven years (1987-1993) in Auco, and detected prey selectivity in comparison to the proportional abundance of small mammals in the field (the main prey of this owl). The main numerical component of the diet was insects (79%), specifically families in the order Coleoptera (Tenebrionidae, Scarabaeidae, Carabidae, and Curculionidae), and to a lesser extent, arachnids (11%). Vertebrates accounted for only 10% of the total numer of prey, but their energy content largely exceeded that of insects and arachnids. Among mammals (6% of total prey), the Cricetid rodents Phyllotis darwini, Akodon olivaceus and Oligoryzomys longicaudatus, and the Didelphid marsupial Thylamys elegans, were the most frequent and constant in the diet of the owl. There was a consistent and significant (P < 0.05) underconsumption of Abrothrix longipilis, Chinchilla lanigera, Octodon degus, and P. darwini. However, there was a marginally significant (P < 0.07) overconsumption of T. elegans. Underconsumed mammals exceeded 45 g on average, whereas overconsumed ones did not exceed 28 g (with a single exception). Thus, there seems to be a maximum critical prey size that S. cunicularia es capable of handling. Amphibians made up only 4% of total prey, whereas reptiles and birds appeared only as trace elements (<< 1%).

During fall and winter an increase in the consumption of insects generally occurred, whereas during spring and summer an increase in the consumption of arachnids and vertebrates was noted. These results indicate that S. cunicularia is a seasonally opportunist predator.

legend  (3111 bytes)

Prey selectity (4287 bytes)

Back to Top

On the long-term dynamics of guild structure among predatory vertebrates in Auco
During 1987-1990 we monitored diets and populations of 10 species of predatory vertebrates (two foxes, four falconiforms, and four owls) in Auco. Pellets (birds) and feces (foxes) collected monthly contained identifiable remains of small mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, large insects, other arthropods, and (in some fox feces) fruits.

Pseudalopex culpaeusFor non-mammalian prey, seasonal variation in availability appeared to be more pronounced than longer-term variation. In contrast, availability of the eight species of small mammals varied relatively little between predators' breeding and non-breeding seasons but declined by an order of magnitude through the first 3 yr of the study. Rather than responding to these shifts in food availability by diverging in diet during "lean" times and converging opportunistically during "fat" times, predators in Auco responded in idiosyncratic ways. Predators of all species tended to maintain species-specific means in size of prey taken regardless of shifts in the relative availability of prey size classes. Two owl species maintained strict mammal diets throughout the decline in mammal abundance, whereas two other owls plus the two fox species maintained a tight feeding guild based on arthropods as well as mammals and other food groups.

The four falconiforms failed to maintain consistent diets from season to season, and consequently ended up temporarily in unique positions in "diet hyperspace" or else joined temporarily one of the two consistent guilds. The degree to which falconiform diets were unique in a given season showed no clear relation to food abundance. Changes in use of habitat did, however, relate to changes in food abundance. None of the falconiforms resided continuously in the study area throughout the period, and their occurrence was particularly sporadic late in our study even for falconiform species that were not particularly mammalivorous.

Back to Top

Home