|
AUCO LONG-TERM ECOLOGICAL
RESEARCH site |
|
|
|
|
|
Research Highlights |
|
|
Vegetation and seed bank

| South
facing slope |
North
facing slope |
 |
 |
|
On spatiotemporal variation of vegetation and
seed bank, as affected by ENSO (El Niņo Southern Oscillation) in Auco
|
|
We monitored plant cover and soil seed density of shrubs
and herbs in two markedly contrasting years with regard to annual rainfall (the dry 1996
vs the ENSO-driven, wet year of 1997), in two opposite-facing slopes (mesic v/s xeric),
and the intervening --relatively wet-- ravine of a typical creek of Auco. During the ENSO
year, cover of ephemerals increased over five times its previous level (43% vs 8%) in the
xeric slope; almost three times (75% vs 26%) in the mesic slope; and almost doubled (57%
vs 32%) in the ravine. The number of species was almost three times higher in the xeric
slope (29 vs 10 species), increased by 57% in the mesic slope (33 vs 21), and by 19% in
the ravine (25 vs 21). Cover of shrubs plus perennial grasses increased from 52% in 1996
to 59% in 1997 in the xeric slope, from 48% to 49% in the mesic slope, and remained in 43%
in the ravine. Number of shrub plus perennial species remained constant between years: 13
in the xeric slope, 17 in the mesic slope, and 20 in the ravine. In the xeric slope, peak
density of seeds was 4,500 seeds/m2 in 1996, while during the ENSO year it was 24,000
seeds/m2 , over five times higher. In the mesic slope, equivalent figures were 3,000 and
17,000 seeds/m2, almost six times higher. In the ravine, figures were 8,500 and 27,000
seeds/m2, over three times higher. The strong responses of ephemerals and of the seed bank
to the ENSO-driven wet year of 1997 demonstrate the importance of this phenomenon in
replenishing and recovering, and likely maintaining, ephemeral vegetation in the semiarid
region of Chile. |
Summary
of plant and seed responses to the ENSO-driven wet year of 1997 in comparison to the
previous dry year, in three landscape features of Auco. |
Xeric slope
|
Dry
1996 |
Wet
1997 |
%Difference |
|
Ephemeral herb cover |
8% |
43% |
438 |
|
Ephemeral herb species |
10 |
29 |
190 |
|
Shrub and perennial cover |
52% |
59% |
13 |
|
Shrub and perennial
species |
13 |
13 |
0 |
|
Total seed bank (seeds/m2) |
4,500 |
24,000 |
433 |
Mesic
slope
|
Dry
1996 |
Wet
1997 |
%Difference |
|
Ephemeral herb cover |
26% |
75% |
188 |
|
Ephemeral herb species |
21 |
33 |
57 |
|
Shrub and perennial cover |
48% |
49% |
2 |
|
Shrub and perennial
species |
17 |
17 |
0 |
|
Total seed bank (seeds/m2) |
3,000 |
17,000 |
467 |
Ravine
|
Dry
1996 |
Wet
1997 |
%Difference |
|
Ephemeral herb cover |
32% |
57% |
78 |
|
Ephemeral herb species |
21 |
25 |
19 |
|
Shrub and perennial cover |
43% |
43% |
0 |
|
Shrub and perennial
species |
20 |
20 |
0 |
|
Total seed bank (seeds/m2) |
8,500 |
27,000 |
218 |
|
|
Back to Top |
Home |
|
|
|